In the wake of the Reformation, two countries stimulated a snow of heavy(p) change, and whether growth or decline, this change was drastic. After Elizabeth I died at the turn of the century, James I took the throne of England and took absolutism with him. He and the next five successors would oversee the growth of England from an erratic, absolutist monarchy to a working, stable Constitutional monarchy. France was non fortunate enough to experience such growth. In contrast, it experienced great decline because the pastoral did not evolve and continued with absolutism even a century after England had proven that type of governing was not effective.
There are several aspects of each country that are interest to compare. The foremost of these aspects being the political, economic, religious and social situations. Despite numerous similarities in some of these categories, the extreme differences, in the end, caused them to take contrasting courses in their evolution toward modern government.
The politics of England during the 17th century follow two absolute monarchs, a dictator, two much monarchs, and then the first constitutional monarch ever.
When James I became the first Stuart king of England in the dawn of the 17th century, he was completely unfamiliar with the English parliament.
He believed in the foretell Right of Kings, or the belief that kings had a divine function to their authority and were responsible only to him. He did not receive responsible to fan tan or his people, or that he had to administer his power with anyone. In this way he introduced absolutism to England.
His boy Charles I became Englands second absolute monarch in 1625. He was similarly foolish in terms of relations with Parliament; however, because of his many foolish wars he needed the money that Parliament guaranteed him. There was already...
If you want to get a full essay, assure it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment