Arthur Millers The Crucible: Gaining Integrity through Failure
Integrity is achieved through the gaining of recognition; the gaining of learning is a direct result of failure. Arthur Miller wrote the object lessonizing drama, The Crucible, in this play the main character John Proctor was falsely accused of witchcraft and served the death penalty along with devil others. The story of John Proctor was indirectly summarized by the American author William Saroyan when he said, Good people...are good because theyve come to wisdom through failure, meaning that a person willing to turn over for his beliefs is good because although he has failed, by not according to his moral codes he has gained integrity and the ability to refuse to live a life of hypocrisy; further, John Proctor is good because he died refusing to lie in rig to live. Proctor failed because his commitments wavered depending upon his own individualisedised needs. Miller demonstrated Proctors failure, and later redemption and goodness end-to-end the text by means of portrayal, conflict, and theme.
Miller uses the literary element of characterization to show John Proctors transformation from failure to goodness. There is a definite contradiction in Proctor; additionally, he says that he loves his wife; but, he adulters her as soon as she becomes ill.
similarly he does not attend church because he dislikes the federal agency in which Reverend Samuel Parris governs the church, as well as the itinerary he preaches. Proctor abhors how Parris uses donations for the church to buy superfluous things, ...When I look to heaven and see my m 1y glaring at his elbows- it hurt my prayer, sir, it hurt my prayer (69).
Williams 2
Proctors commitment wavers depending upon his own personal needs. Arthur Miller characterized him as one with weak theology and one who struggled with personal commitment, in...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment