Should foreigners pay more? (long)

In many rest homes, foreign trimors argon presenced more than locals when they visit heathenish or tourer attractions. Do you agree or disagree with this?\n\nTo visit the pulchritudinous and remote mountain state of Bhutan, foreigners (everyone without a Bhutanese or an Indian passport) ache to carry up to $240 a day. This is an extreme example of charging visitors more than locals, but the country has many validated reasons for this policy. In this essay, I allow say why I generally agree with foreigners give more to visit cultural or historical situations.\n\nIts idle to see why whatsoever foreign visitors resent beingness charged more. First of all, nothing interchangeables to generate more than otherwise people for the same thing. Its nettle to know that the person beside you in a queue or at a holidaymaker attraction has remunerative lotstimes little just because of his or her nationality. A second headache point is that you often dont embark on a ny better wait on just because you have paid more to enter a historical site or entertainment venue. In fact, the place is often overcrowded with locals and your visit place suffer. Furthermore, knowing that you as a foreign visitor are delivering more often makes you bad-tempered and therefore less likely to enjoy the experience. Finally, just about(prenominal) think that places such as Cambodias Angkor Wat or Irelands Cliffs of Moher are worldly concern cultural or livelihoodlike treasures and should be open to everyone. They are not the property of some money-grabbing ministry.\n\nHowever, there are tidy reasons why overseas visitors should pay more. For one thing, foreign tourism is still a countenance of the well-off. Why should countries not charge rich visitors as much as the market exit bear? Nobody is squeeze to visit these places. Second, the attraction or cultural site is aff melodic line of the local communitys history and heritage. They should not have to pay to h older about their own history. A ! third point is that it is extremely expensive to maintain places like Istanbuls Topkapi palace. Tourists who may be tour once in a lifetime can and should lend to the cost of maintenance. In fact, this is the near important point: if you have dreamed all your life of visiting Perus Machu Picchu or Chinas Terracotta array then surely you are ready to spend a little more for this experience.\n\nIn conclusion, we need to put things in perspective. The admission fees rarely add much to the cost of our visit, compared to hotels or travel, and we as foreign travelers uphold maintain and preserve the site for the locals and for future generations.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nShould foreigners pay more? (short)\nTravel and outside(a) understanding\nDoes cheap air travel damage the purlieu?\nWho is valued close to in society old or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)