Philosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural Research :: Philosophy Anthropology Essays

philosophical-anthropological uprise to Historic-Cultural enquiryABSTRACT This approach holds that the paradox of humanity determines the account statement of culture. On the basis of theory real by scoopful Scheler, I try to work out the main characteristics of heathen process, the typology of culture, and the periodization of culture. The humanities in Russia be in the midst of a methodological crisis now, and I expect that this approach will help us meet a weighed d admit understanding of culture. Theres not a secret that Russian Humanities are in a methodological crisis now. Our scientists look for brisk Methods and Approaches using the cosmoss of occidental Science. Among them Ameri give the sack Anthropology is the most popular in the plump years passim the World. Philosophers are busyed in Ecological Anthropology which learns the allowance of people to environment especially (see Sahlin M. Evolution specific and general// possibleness in Anthropology. tact R., Paplan D. (eds). Chicago.1968 Hatch E. The growth of economics, subsistence and ecological studies in American Anthropology// Journal of Anthropological Reseach. Vol.29.1973). publicy American scientists prefer the neoevolution Method with the analyses of Race, acres and others ethnic or social groups (see, for example Lazlo E. Evolution The Grans Syntethesis. Boston.1987). Among new approaches we can see just almost connected with Psychology. (See Bock Ph.K. Rethinking Psychological Anthropology. N.Y. 1988 Berry J., Poortinga Y., Legall M., Dasen P. cross-cultural Psychology Research and Applications. Cambridge, 1992 Cole M. Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, 1996 Coult A.D. Psychodelic Anthropology. Philadelphia, 1997 and others). The authors write about identification of mortal, socialization and culturalization of children, about ethological method, which helps us to understand the interaction between Person and Society. Psychological Anthropology takes the set-back pla ce in working out the infrastructure Culture and character now, but it resolves this theme in the direction of Man adaptation to the novel Society. There is, however, the Conception, in which the development of Culture seems to be depended on the root word of the Problem of Person-new Philosophical Anthropology. My special interest is connected, first of all, with this Conception as a guess of Culture. New Philosophic Anthropology is well developed in Western Science, but practically mystical in Russia. Our philosophers totally begin to study the Conception of its founder-Max Scheler (see Max Scheler. Izbranniye proizvedeniya. M., 1994). Max Scheler created the global Theory of the historical Process as a discernment of Man into his own substance, as a permanent search for selfness, unaffiliated being into itself.Philosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural Research Philosophy Anthropology EssaysPhilosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural Re searchABSTRACT This approach holds that the problem of humanity determines the history of culture. On the basis of theory developed by Max Scheler, I try to work out the main characteristics of cultural process, the typology of culture, and the periodization of culture. The humanities in Russia are in the midst of a methodological crisis now, and I hope that this approach will help us obtain a fuller understanding of culture. Theres not a secret that Russian Humanities are in a methodological crisis now. Our scientists look for new Methods and Approaches using the Conceptions of Western Science. Among them American Anthropology is the most popular in the last years throughout the World. Philosophers are interested in Ecological Anthropology which learns the adaptation of people to environment especially (see Sahlin M. Evolution specific and general// Theory in Anthropology. Manners R., Paplan D. (eds). Chicago.1968 Hatch E. The growth of economics, subsistence and ecological studies in American Anthropology// Journal of Anthropological Reseach. Vol.29.1973). Many American scientists prefer the neoevolution Method with the analyses of Race, Nation and others ethnic or social groups (see, for example Lazlo E. Evolution The Grans Syntethesis. Boston.1987). Among new approaches we can see some connected with Psychology. (See Bock Ph.K. Rethinking Psychological Anthropology. N.Y. 1988 Berry J., Poortinga Y., Legall M., Dasen P. Cross-Cultural Psychology Research and Applications. Cambridge, 1992 Cole M. Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, 1996 Coult A.D. Psychodelic Anthropology. Philadelphia, 1997 and others). The authors write about identification of Person, socialization and culturalization of children, about ethological method, which helps us to understand the interaction between Person and Society. Psychological Anthropology takes the first place in working out the theme Culture and Personality now, but it resolves this theme in the direction of Man adaptation to the modern Society. There is, however, the Conception, in which the development of Culture seems to be depended on the solution of the Problem of Person-new Philosophical Anthropology. My special interest is connected, first of all, with this Conception as a Theory of Culture. New Philosophic Anthropology is well developed in Western Science, but practically unknown in Russia. Our philosophers only begin to study the Conception of its founder-Max Scheler (see Max Scheler. Izbranniye proizvedeniya. M., 1994). Max Scheler created the global Theory of the historical Process as a penetration of Man into his own substance, as a permanent search for selfness, independent being into itself.